Key result
Nondental invasive procedures are linked to subsequent infective endocarditis in nationwide observational studies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
There have been no published prospective randomized clinical trials that have: (1) established an association between invasive dental and nondental invasive procedures and risk of infective endocarditis; or (2) defined the efficacy and safety of antibiotic prophylaxis administered in the setting of invasive procedures in the prevention of infective endocarditis in high-risk patients. Moreover, previous observational studies that examined the association of nondental invasive procedures with the risk of infective endocarditis have been limited by inadequate sample size. They have typically focused on a few potential at-risk surgical and nonsurgical invasive procedures. However, recent investigations from Sweden and England that used nationwide databases and demonstrated an association between nondental invasive procedures, and the subsequent development of infective endocarditis (in particular, in high-risk patients with infective endocarditis) prompted the development of the current science advisory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baddour et al. (2023) conducted a review in Infective endocarditis. Nondental invasive procedures was evaluated on Subsequent development of infective endocarditis. Nondental invasive procedures were associated with subsequent infective endocarditis in nationwide database studies from Sweden and England, though 0 prospective RCTs exist.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: