Key result
Insertable cardiac monitors enable early detection of arrhythmias in selected populations, but their prognostic benefit in rare diseases and non-syncopal patients remains uncertain.
Why the study?
The 2018 ESC Syncope guidelines expanded the indications for an ICM to patients with unexplained syncope and primary cardiomyopathy or inheritable arrhythmogenic disorders, prompting a review of the clinical evidence for risk stratification.
Does an insertable cardiac monitor improve early detection of clinically relevant arrhythmias in patients with unexplained syncope and primary cardiomyopathy or inheritable arrhythmogenic disorders?
Does an insertable cardiac monitor improve early detection of clinically relevant arrhythmias in patients with unexplained syncope and primary cardiomyopathy or inheritable arrhythmogenic disorders?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Insertable cardiac monitors are useful for early detection of arrhythmias in selected patients with unexplained syncope and cardiomyopathies, though their impact on prognosis in rare diseases remains uncertain.
INTRODUCTION: The 2018 ESC Syncope guidelines expanded the indications for an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) to patients with unexplained syncope and primary cardiomyopathy or inheritable arrhythmogenic disorders. AREAS COVERED: This review article discusses the clinical evidence for using an ICM for risk stratification in different patient populations including Brugada syndrome, long QT syndrome, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, cardiac sarcoidosis, and congenital heart disease. EXPERT OPINION: Clinical data on the usefulness of ICMs in different patient populations is limited but most studies demonstrate early detection of clinically relevant arrhythmias, such as nonsustained ventricular tachycardia or atrial fibrillation. It is important to emphasize that the study populations usually comprise selected populations where conventional diagnostic methods fail to clarify the mechanism of symptoms. The effect of an ICM on prognosis by earlier detection of arrhythmias is difficult to demonstrate in populations with rare disease. Risk stratification in patients with cardiomyopathy or inheritable arrhythmogenic disorders remains a niche indication for ICMs. The most important indication for an ICM remains unexplained syncope in patients at low risk of SCD. Given the device costs and uncertain clinical value of device-detected arrhythmias, it is unclear whether it is also useful in non-syncopal patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Assaf et al. (2023) conducted a review in Unexplained syncope, primary cardiomyopathy, or inheritable arrhythmogenic disorders. Insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) was evaluated. Insertable cardiac monitors enable early detection of arrhythmias in selected populations, but their prognostic benefit in rare diseases and non-syncopal patients remains uncertain.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: