Key result
Only ~59% of high-risk ASCVD patients achieve target LDL-C on maximally tolerated therapy.
Observational (n=704)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Physician disagreement with guidelines is the primary barrier to intensifying lipid-lowering therapy and achieving LDL-C targets in very high-risk ASCVD patients.
BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the challenges Korean physicians face in assisting their high-risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) patients in achieving guideline-recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. METHODS: We performed a prospective, implementation science study including 704 patients at very high risk of ASCVD with baseline LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L) while receiving maximally tolerated statins and/or ezetimibe for secondary prevention between 2020 and 2022. The primary evaluation criteria were the proportions of participants achieving LDL-C < 70 mg/dL at each visit. The secondary evaluation criteria included the proportions of participants in diverse situations associated with guideline adoption. RESULTS: The proportions of participants achieving LDL-C < 70 mg/dL at visits 2 (week 6-16) and 3 (week 18-30) were 56.3% and 58.7%, respectively. Among 307 patients on maximally tolerated statins and 397 patients on maximally tolerated statins and ezetimibe at baseline, physicians did not have an intention to intensify the lipid-lowering treatment regimen of 171 patients (55.7%) and 299 patients (75.3%) at visit 1, respectively. In both groups, physician disagreement with the guidelines was the major reason for not adopting the recommended therapy (70.8% and 46.2%, respectively), followed by patient refusal for reasons other than the cost, medical limitations such as comorbidities, and drug costs. CONCLUSION: This implementation science study for secondary prevention involving very high-risk ASCVD patients revealed that the proportion of patients achieving LDL-C < 70 mg/dL via lipid-lowering therapy was less than 60%. The main reason for not adopting the recommended LDL-C-lowering therapy was physician disagreement with the guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0005488.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cho et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Very high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (n=704). Guideline-recommended LDL-C-lowering therapy was evaluated on Proportions of participants achieving LDL-C < 70 mg/dL at each visit. Among very high-risk ASCVD patients on maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapy, only 58.7% achieved LDL-C < 70 mg/dL by weeks 18-30, primarily due to physician disagreement with guidelines.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: