Context Rice is a staple food for nearly half of the global population. Traditional nitrogen (N) fertilization practices, characterized by high inputs and frequent applications, face increasing challenges related to low N use efficiency (NUE) and rising labor costs. Research question Previous studies have highlighted the benefits of controlled-release blended fertilizers (CRBF) for enhancing rice production. While limited research has been conducted on the effects of CRBF with different fertilization techniques and their applicability within rice-wheat systems. Methods A three-year field experiment was conducted at two sites with contrasting soil fertility levels. Six treatments were evaluated: broadcast conventional fertilization of urea (BCF), broadcast conventional fertilization of urea with a 25 % reduction in N (BRF), broadcast fertilization of CRBF with a 25 % reduction in N (BBF), whole-layer fertilization of CRBF with a 25 % reduction in N (WBF), side-deep fertilization of CRBF with a 25 % reduction in N (SBF), and a control without N fertilization. Results Compared to BCF, SBF increased rice yield by 3.2–8.8 % primarily due to a 5.1–6.7 % increase in panicle numbers, and all CRBF treatments enhanced NUE by 27.6–60.8 % with SBF exhibiting the highest. Notably, SBF improved rice yield and NUE by 6.0–7.0 % and 19.4–25.2 % compared to other CRBF treatments in low-fertility site, respectively, while no significant differences were observed among CRBF treatments in high-fertility site. This pattern reflects the differing responses of rice growth and soil N availability to fertilization patterns under varying soil fertility conditions. Our structural equation model results indicate that fertilization patterns primarily influence rice yield by affecting soil NH 4 + -N levels and subsequently altering root growth . Economic analysis revealed that SBF resulted in a 37.2–40.1 % increase in net income compared to BCF, primarily due to reduced labor costs and improved yields, with smaller differences among CRBF treatments in high-fertility site. Conclusions CRBF emerges as a viable alternative to conventional N fertilization, effectively delivering high rice yields and enhanced economic returns across sites with varying soil fertility. SBF optimizes N supply and boosts rice production, yielding significant increases in both yield and NUE, particularly in low-fertility environments. Implications The findings of this study offer a novel perspective on achieving high yields and efficient fertilization strategies in rice cultivation within rice-wheat systems, potentially guiding future agricultural practices toward improved sustainability and productivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: