A new combined differential‐integral approach (CDI) has been developed, which is more accurate than commonly used pseudospherical models but not so complicated and computer time‐consuming as a fully spherical model. The radiative transfer equation is solved in its integral form. The multiple‐scattering source function is obtained by solving the integrodifferential radiative transfer equation in a pseudospherical atmosphere. Relative differences between the new model and the pseudospherical model for a variety of solar zenith angles, viewing angles, and azimuth angles for a set of wavelengths are presented. Furthermore, the GDI model is compared with a Gauss‐Seidel spherical model (GSS) and with MODTRAN. The difference between GDI and GSS is found to be less than 2% and between GDI and MODTRAN up to 12%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rozanov et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: