Why the study?
Does mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction predict thrombogenicity on TEE in patients with suspected cardioembolic stroke?
Does mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction predict thrombogenicity on TEE in patients with suspected cardioembolic stroke?
Mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (<=50%) and atrial fibrillation are independent predictors of thrombogenicity on TEE in patients with suspected cardioembolic stroke.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mildly reduced LVEF may mark higher thrombogenicity on TEE; leaves open whether it should guide anticoagulation before prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been recognized as a valuable tool for identifying the left cardiac thrombus (LCT) or spontaneous echocardiographic contrast (SEC). We aimed to identify risk groups where TEE should be performed in patients with suspected cardioembolic stroke according to magnetic resonance imaging analysis. METHODS: One hundred and forty-six patients (mean age 64.7 +/- 11.8 years, 101 males) with suspected cardioembolic stroke were analyzed. We used TEE for the presence of LCT and/or SEC as indication of thrombogenicity. We evaluated the association between thrombogenicity and demographic features, stroke risk factors and echocardiographic variables. RESULTS: The study included 40 patients (27.3%) who showed thrombogenicity (10 LCT and 30 SEC). The independent echocardiographic variables of thrombogenicity were atrial fibrillation (OR 7.14; 95% CI 2.62-19.48; p < 0.001) and left ventricular ejection fraction </=50% (OR 4.01; 95% CI 1.40-11.49; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: We recommend that TEE should be considered in patients with mildly reduced left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction </=50%) after suspected cardioembolic stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kwon et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: