Key result
No clinical data or findings are available in the provided text.
Why the study?
Does aspirin with prasugrel or ticagrelor reduce MACCE or increase bleeding compared to aspirin with clopidogrel in East Asian patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Observational
Yes
Does aspirin with prasugrel or ticagrelor reduce MACCE or increase bleeding compared to aspirin with clopidogrel in East Asian patients with acute myocardial infarction?
In East Asian patients with acute myocardial infarction, third-generation P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel, ticagrelor) do not reduce 1-year MACCE but significantly increase bleeding risk compared to clopidogrel.
Associated bleeding increase without MACCE reduction in East Asian AMI cautions against routine third-generation P2Y12 preference; leaves open randomized confirmation.
Third-generation P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel, ticagrelor) are recommended in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of third-generation P2Y12 inhibitors in East Asian AMI patients. From the Korean AMI Registry, 9,355 patients who received dual antiplatelet agent (aspirin with clopidogrel [AC], 6,444 [70.5%] patients; aspirin with prasugrel [AP], 1,100 [11.8%] patients; or aspirin with ticagrelor [AT], 1,811 [19.4%] patients) were analysed. In-hospital endpoints were all-cause mortality or bleeding events during admission and 1-year endpoints were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and major bleeding events. Regarding in-hospital events, AP and AT showed similar all-cause mortality rates but higher bleeding event rates compared with AC. This trend was extended to 1-year endpoints; Cox regression analysis showed that third-generation P2Y12 inhibitors had significantly higher bleeding risk (AP vs. AC: hazard ratio [HR], 2.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.53–2.99; p < 0.001; AT vs. AC: HR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.73–2.95; p < 0.001). A propensity score matched triplet of 572 patients showed similar 1-year MACCE and higher bleeding events with third-generation P2Y12 inhibitors (2.1 vs. 2.6 vs. 2.1%, p = 0.790 for MACCE and 3.1 vs. 8.0 vs. 8.0%, p < 0.001 for bleeding events, in AC, AP and AT groups, respectively). Inverse probability weighted regression analysis and pooled analysis after randomly imputing missing variables showed consistent results. Collectively, prasugrel and ticagrelor showed similar rates of 1-year MACCE, but a higher rate of bleeding events, compared with clopidogrel in Korean AMI patients. Further studies are warranted to adapt Western guidelines on third-generation P2Y12 inhibitors for East Asians.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Acute Myocardial Infarction. Third-Generation P2Y12 Inhibitors was evaluated. No clinical data or findings are available in the provided text.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: