Why the study?
Does a combination of specific platelet function tests identify antiplatelet resistance in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy after angioplasty and stent implantation?
Does a combination of specific platelet function tests identify antiplatelet resistance in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy after angioplasty and stent implantation?
A combination of specific platelet function tests (PFA100 and Multiplate) may help identify patients with poor compliance or antiplatelet resistance who could benefit from a change in therapy.
INTRODUCTION: The increasing demand for therapeutic monitoring in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy has been paralleled by the development of instruments and tests whose clinical usefulness is still under debate. We devised a laboratory approach to detect patients with antiplatelet resistance at risk to develop thrombotic events. METHODS: One hundred and eighty patients, under aspirin and clopidogrel after angioplasty and stent implantation, were studied by PFA100(®) with collagen/epinephrine (CoEPI, cutoff 165s) cartridge and by Multiplate(®) using arachidonic acid (ASPItest, pos < 862AUC), ADP (ADPtest, pos < 417AUC), and collagen (COLtest, pos < 607AUC). RESULTS: Only 67 of 173 patients with ASPI < 862 displayed a prolonged CoEPI and up to 65 patients had normal CoEPI despite ASPI < 300. Patients with ASPI < 300 had significantly lower COL than patients with ASPI > 300. One hundred and thirty-eight patients displaying ADP < 417 had significantly lower COL than those with ADP > 417. Association between COL and ADP remained after ASPI stratification: in patients with suboptimal (ASPI 300-892) or maximal (ASPI < 300) response to aspirin, having ADP < 417 (clopidogrel responsive) increased COL positivity, respectively, from 9.5 to 58.8% and from 47.6 to 82.7%. CONCLUSION: A combination of specific tests may be useful in identifying higher-risk patients with poor compliance or drug resistance who potentially may benefit from therapy change.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vidali et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: