The authors examine the reasons behind the fact that the Gaussian autocorrelation-function model, widely used in remote sensing, yields a particularly ill-conditioned sample-covariance matrix in the case of many strongly correlated samples. The authors explore the question numerically and relate the magnitude of the matrix-condition number to the nonnegativity requirement satisfied by all correlation functions. They show that the condition number exhibits explosive growth near the boundary of the allowed-parameter space, simple numerical recipes are suggested in order to avoid this instability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kostinski et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: