(VDTS) was performed by means of the molecular sensory science concept. A total of 64 aroma-active compounds were identified via gas chromatography-olfactometry (GC-O) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Aroma extract dilution analysis (AEDA) and static headspace dilution analysis revealed 39 odorants in SDTS and 32 odorants in VDTS with flavor dilution (FD) factors from 8 to 4096, with the highest for vanillin and eugenol in both samples. Stable isotope dilution analysis (SIDA) and an internal standard method were applied to quantitate 42 odorants, revealing 35 compounds in concentrations above their respective odor thresholds in SDTS and 29 compounds in VDTS, respectively. Calculation of odor activity values (OAVs) indicated 2-isopropyl-3-methoxypyrazine, eugenol, and β-ionone with the highest OAVs in both samples. Recombination experiments of the overall aromas of SDTS and VDTS by mixing the odorants with OAVs ≥1 in their naturally occurring concentrations proved the successful identification and quantitation of the respective key odorants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhai et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: