Key result
Load cell sensors embedded on a hospital bed estimated tidal volume with a correlation of 0.85 and RMSE of 0.23 L compared to a reference spirometer in healthy subjects.
Why the study?
Measurement of respiratory parameters is commonly overshadowed compared to cardiac parameters, creating an open need for unobtrusive and quantifiable respiratory monitoring technologies without subject-specific calibration.
Does a load cell sensor system on a hospital bed accurately estimate respiratory rate and tidal volume compared to a spirometer in healthy subjects?
Observational (n=15)
Does a load cell sensor system on a hospital bed accurately estimate respiratory rate and tidal volume compared to a spirometer in healthy subjects?
Load cell sensors embedded in hospital beds can accurately estimate respiratory rate and tidal volume without subject-specific calibration, offering a potential method for continuous respiratory monitoring.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Existing hospital-bed load cells may support continuous unobtrusive respiratory monitoring; leaves open prospective ICU validation.
Although respiratory failure is one of the primary causes of admission to intensive care, the importance placed on measurement of respiratory parameters is commonly overshadowed compared to cardiac parameters. With the increased demand for unobtrusive yet quantifiable respiratory monitoring, many technologies have been proposed recently. However, there are challenges to be addressed for such technologies to enable widespread use. In this work, we explore the feasibility of using load cell sensors embedded on a hospital bed for monitoring respiratory rate (RR) and tidal volume (TV). We propose a globalized machine learning (ML)-based algorithm for estimating TV without the requirement of subject-specific calibration or training. In a study of 15 healthy subjects performing respiratory tasks in four different postures, the outputs from four load cell channels and the reference spirometer were recorded simultaneously. A signal processing pipeline was implemented to extract features that capture respiratory movement and the respiratory effects on the cardiac (i.e., ballistocardiogram, BCG) signals. The proposed RR estimation algorithm achieved a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.6 breaths per minute (brpm) against the ground truth RR from the spirometer. The TV estimation results demonstrated that combining all three axes of the low-frequency force signals and the BCG heartbeat features best quantifies the respiratory effects of TV. The model resulted in a correlation and RMSE between the estimated and true TV values of 0.85 and 0.23 L, respectively, in the posture independent model without electrocardiogram (ECG) signals. This study suggests that load cell sensors already existing in certain hospital beds can be used for convenient and continuous respiratory monitoring in general care settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2022 study conducted an observational in Healthy subjects (n=15). Load cell sensors embedded on a hospital bed vs. Reference spirometer was evaluated on Tidal volume (TV) estimation accuracy (correlation 0.85, RMSE 0.23 L). Load cell sensors embedded on a hospital bed estimated tidal volume with a correlation of 0.85 and RMSE of 0.23 L compared to a reference spirometer in healthy subjects.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: