Why the study?
In certain clinical cases, physiologic measurements may not accurately reflect coronary disease severity compared with anatomical measurements.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
Physiology may mislead versus imaging in selected acute or complex lesions; leaves open trials of anatomy-first revascularization strategies.
Physiologic assessment has become an essential tool to guide revascularization decisions due to the multiple limitations of angiographic and anatomic measures of physiologic significance. However, in certain cases the apparent physiologic measurement may not accurately reflect the severity of coronary disease compared with anatomical measurements. This article will review how anatomy trumps physiology in cases of acute coronary syndromes, left main disease, saphenous vein graft lesions, and myocardial bridging, and how to overcome the limitations of physiologic measurement in these clinical situations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Premyodhin et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: