Retrospective cohort study reveals strong discriminative accuracy of PREDICT models in Japanese breast cancer cases, suggesting version 3.0 effectively guides adjuvant therapy decisions.
BACKGROUND: PREDICT is a prognostic tool developed in the United Kingdom to estimate postoperative overall survival (OS) and the additional benefits of adjuvant therapies in patients with breast cancer. It has been validated in various international cohorts and continuously updated with the inclusion of new variables and model retraining. However, their efficacy in the Japanese population remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the generalizability of PREDICT versions 2.2 (v2.2) and 3.0 (v3.0) using data from the National Cancer Center Hospital in Japan, a high-volume cancer center. METHODS: We analyzed a retrospective cohort (2006-2016) including 2,980 cases of postoperative breast cancer. We calculated survival predictions using both v2.2 and v3.0, and compared them with the Kaplan-Meier-estimated survival probabilities using a calibration plot. Additionally, we performed a time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for v2.2 and v3.0. RESULTS: Both models tended to underestimate survival in our cohort, whereas v3.0 showed improved calibration compared to v2.2, for 5- and 10-year OS. Both v2.2 and v3.0 maintained good discriminative performance throughout 10 years, with values under the ROC curve generally above 0.80. CONCLUSIONS: Despite these differences, both versions demonstrated satisfactory performance, suggesting that they can be generalized for Japanese patients with postoperative breast cancer. Notably, v3.0, given its improved calibration, might be more suitable for supporting shared decision making. The model's performance in predicting 5-year OS supports its generalizability, whereas 10-year projections warrant caution due to limited follow-up. Overall, this study demonstrates that PREDICT is a valuable prognostic tool for Japanese patients with breast cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hashiguchi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Breast Cancer