This article reports on an assessment of the relationship between accounting students' scores on the Kolb learning style inventory (LSI) continuums—the abstract-to-concrete and the active-to-reflective continuums—and the students' performance on different accounting examination formats. We examined four formats, those of multiple-choice theory, multiple-choice quantitative, open-ended theory, and open-ended quantitative. Along with the two learning style continuum variables, the model included sex, age, and accounting GPA. A hierarchical multiple regression analysis indicated that a learning style variable was significant for performance on each format except the multiple-choice quantitative format.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holley et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: