Why the study?
No model had been presented to evaluate different deployments or system configurations for successful non-contact breathing rate estimation using received signal strength measurements.
Introduces and evaluates a received signal strength model for non-contact respiration rate monitoring, showing different estimators perform better under different signal-to-noise ratio conditions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May guide SNR-specific estimator selection in RSS respiration monitoring; leaves open clinical validation.
Received signal strength based respiration rate monitoring is emerging as an alternative non-contact technology. These systems make use of the radio measurements of short-range commodity wireless devices, which vary due to the inhalation and exhalation motion of a person. The success of respiration rate estimation using such measurements depends on the signal-to-noise ratio, which alters with properties of the person and with the measurement system. To date, no model has been presented that allows evaluation of different deployments or system configurations for successful breathing rate estimation. In this paper, a received signal strength model for respiration rate monitoring is introduced. It is shown that measurements in linear and logarithmic scale have the same functional form, and the same estimation techniques can be used in both cases. The model is numerically and empirically evaluated, and its properties are discussed in depth. The most important model implications are validated under varying signal-to-noise ratio conditions using the performances of three estimators: batch frequency estimator, recursive Bayesian estimator, and model-based estimator. The results are in coherence with the findings, and they imply that different estimators are advantageous in different signal-to-noise ratio regimes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yi̇ği̇tler et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: