Why the study?
Implementing a structured activity to encourage exercise in children may be a strategy with benefits, but the pulmonary function effects of The Daily Mile were unknown.
Does The Daily Mile school-based exercise program improve pulmonary function in elementary school children?
Does The Daily Mile school-based exercise program improve pulmonary function in elementary school children?
A structured, daily 15-minute school-based running program significantly improved pulmonary function (FEV1%) in elementary school children over a single semester.
Should not yet change practice; leaves open Daily Mile’s potential lung benefit pending randomized trials.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Implementing a structured activity to encourage exercise in children may be a strategy with benefits. We evaluated pulmonary function in elementary school children participating in a school-based exercise program called The Daily Mile. METHODS: During the fall semester, we implemented The Daily Mile program in one elementary school and compared pulmonary function in children in the intervention school pre- and postintervention to children in a control school in the same community. The primary outcomes were forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1% (the FEV1/FVC ratio). RESULTS: The children in the control school showed no significant change in FEV1% during the semester (P=.06). On the other hand, children in the intervention school showed a significant improvement in FEV1% during the same semester (P=.001). This effect was consistent even when stratifying by asthma and sports participation. CONCLUSIONS: The Daily Mile has benefits for pulmonary function in children. Although family physicians should continue to encourage their patients to have a healthy lifestyle, a more effective approach may be to encourage schools to adopt a program that teachers oversee and administer in a structured way.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mainous et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: