Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We demonstrate that ruthenium oxide (<TEX>RuO₂</TEX>) nanotubes with controlled dimensions can be synthesized using facile electrochemical means and anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) templates. <TEX>RuO₂</TEX> nanotubes were formed using a cyclic voltammetric deposition technique and an aqueous plating solution composed of <TEX>RuCl₃</TEX>. Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) was used to determine the effective electrochemical oxidation potential of <TEX>Ru³⁺</TEX> to <TEX>RuO₂</TEX>. The length and wall thickness of <TEX>RuO₂</TEX> nanotubes can be adjusted by varying the range and cycles of the electrochemical cyclic voltammetric potentials. Thick-walled <TEX>RuO₂</TEX> nanotubes were obtained using a wide electrochemical potential range (-0.2~1 V). In contrast, an electrochemical deposition potential range from 0.8 to 1 V produced thin-walled and longer <TEX>RuO₂</TEX> nanotubes in an identical number of cycles. The dependence of wall thickness and length of <TEX>RuO₂</TEX> nanotubes on the range of cyclic voltammetric electrochemical potentials was attributed to the distinct ionic diffusion times. This significantly improves the ratio of surface area to mass of materials synthesized using AAO templates. Furthermore, this study is directive to the controlled synthesis of other metal oxide nanotubes using a similar strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cho et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: