OBJECTIVE: This report provides reliability and prevalence estimates by sex, age, and race/ethnicity of an observed physical performance examination (PPE) assessing mobility and balance. SETTING: The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) 1988-1994. DESIGN: A cross-sectional nationally representative survey. PARTICIPANTS: All persons aged 60 and older (n = 5,403) who performed the PPE either in the mobile examination center (MEC) or in the home during NHANES III (conducted 1988-1994). MEASUREMENTS: The PPE included timed chair stand, full tandem stand, and timed 8-foot walk. RESULTS: Timed chair stand and 8-foot timed walk were reliable measurements (Intraclass Correlations > 0.5). Women were significantly slower (P < .001) than men for both timed chair stands and timed walk. Non-Hispanic white men and women did the maneuvers in significantly less time than non-Hispanic black men and women and Mexican Americans women (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Lower extremity functions measured by timed chair stand and walk are reliable. Women at every age group were more physically limited than men.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ostchega et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: