Why the study?
ECGs interpreted as normal by conventional computer algorithms may manifest findings of acute coronary occlusion myocardial infarction, and whether artificial intelligence can detect these cases was unknown.
Does the PMcardio OMI AI ECG model improve detection of occlusive myocardial infarction in patients with ECGs interpreted as normal by conventional algorithms?
Does the PMcardio OMI AI ECG model improve detection of occlusive myocardial infarction in patients with ECGs interpreted as normal by conventional algorithms?
The PMcardio AI ECG model can accurately detect occlusive myocardial infarction in a majority of ECGs that are falsely interpreted as normal by conventional computer algorithms.
AI may flag occult OMI among CCA-normal ECGs but should not yet change practice; leaves open prospective testing in unselected patients.
Background: Some authors advocate that ECGs with conventional computer algorithm (CCA) interpretations of “normal” need not be immediately reviewed. However, such ECGs may actually manifest findings of acute coronary occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI). We sought to determine if such cases can be detected by artificial intelligence (AI). Methods: Retrospective series (2014 - 2024) of cases with ≥ 1 pre-angiography ECGs with proven OMI outcome with a CCA ECG interpretation of “normal.” OMI outcome was defined as 1) diagnosis of acute type I MI, 2) angiographic culprit with intervention, 3) one of the following: a) TIMI 0-2 flow, or b) TIMI-3 or unknown flow, with high peak troponin or new wall abnormality. Each ECG was retrospectively interpreted by the PMcardio OMI AI ECG model. The primary analysis was the diagnostic performance of AI for the interpretation of CCA “normal” ECGs for OMI. Results: 42 patients with OMI met inclusion criteria. The first ECG was interpreted as “normal” by the CCA in 88% of cases; AI interpreted 81% as OMI and 86% as abnormal. Of 78 total ECGs interpreted by the CCA, 73% were diagnosed as “normal.” Of this 73%, AI identified 81% as abnormal and 72% as OMI. Conclusion: The CCA may interpret an ECG manifesting OMI as “normal.” AI not only recognized these as abnormal, but, in 81% of patients, correctly recognized OMI on the first ECG, and recognized 72% of all CCA “normal” ECGs as OMI. It was rare for AI to diagnose a normal ECG in any OMI patient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karim et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: