Why the study?
AMR is a promising tool for assessing microvascular function, but its link to periprocedural myocardial injury during elective PCI is unclear.
Is post-PCI microvascular dysfunction associated with periprocedural myocardial injury in patients undergoing uncomplicated elective PCI for stable CAD?
Is post-PCI microvascular dysfunction associated with periprocedural myocardial injury in patients undergoing uncomplicated elective PCI for stable CAD?
Increased microvascular resistance and reduced coronary flow velocity after uncomplicated elective PCI are associated with a higher risk of periprocedural myocardial injury.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change elective PCI practice; leaves open whether post-PCI microvascular indices can predict or prevent pMI.
Background Coronary microcirculation is essential for myocardial perfusion and influences clinical outcomes. The angiographic-derived index of microvascular resistance (AMR) is a promising non-invasive tool for assessing microvascular function, but its link to periprocedural myocardial injury (pMI) is unclear. Objectives To examine coronary flow and microvascular resistance changes during elective PCI and assess the association between post-PCI microvascular dysfunction (measured by AMR) and pMI occurrence. Methods Patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing elective PCI from June 2021 to December 2023 were included. Coronary physiology was assessed using AMR, quantitative flow ratio (μFR), and coronary flow velocity ratio (CFVR). High-sensitive troponin (hsT) levels were measured post-PCI, with pMI defined by the 4th universal definition. Results Among 330 patients, pMI occurred in 184 (55.8%). Post-PCI, μFR increased from 0.64 ± 0.21 cm/s to 0.94 ± 0.06 cm/s (p < 0.01), and AMR rose significantly (from 174.92 ± 71.88 to 256.22 ± 55.61 mmHg·s/m, p < 0.01). Microvascular resistance increased in 86.96% of patients. In pMI patients, coronary flow declined (Delta CFVR: - 1.53 ± 5.38 vs. 0.26 ± 4.95, p = 0.03) and AMR was significantly higher (265.4 ± 56.4 mmHg*s/m vs 244.7 ± 52.4 mmHg*s/m, p < 0.01). Microvascular dysfunction was more common in pMI patients (56.5% vs. 39.7%, p < 0.01), especially those with reduced flow velocity (50.0% vs. 19.1%, p < 0.01). Conclusion This study shows that increased microvascular resistance after PCI— indicated by elevated AMR and reduced RVR—is associated with a higher risk of pMI, while baseline values are not. Despite successful epicardial revascularization, these indices may help guide PCI and evaluate outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jallad et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: