Why the study?
Correlation between CMR-LGE myocardial edema and STE strain at the segmental level in acute myocarditis is inconsistent, prompting evaluation of natural heterogeneity and anatomical orientation mismatch as causes.
Does spatial resolution reduction improve the correlation between segmental myocardial edema assessed by CMR-LGE and strain assessed by STE in patients with acute myocarditis?
Does spatial resolution reduction improve the correlation between segmental myocardial edema assessed by CMR-LGE and strain assessed by STE in patients with acute myocarditis?
Moderate spatial resolution reduction improves the correlation between CMR-LGE and STE in acute myocarditis, potentially addressing anatomic orientation mismatch between the two imaging modalities.
Interpret STE-LGE segmental discordance cautiously in AM; leaves open co-registration and more robust ventricular function indicators.
Background: Acute myocarditis (AM) affects myocardial structure and function, assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance late gadolinium enhancement (CMR-LGE) and speckle tracking echocardiography (STE), respectively; however, the correlation between the two techniques at the segmental level is inconsistent. We studied natural heterogeneity and anatomical orientation mismatch as potential causes of correlation discrepancy. Methods: A total of 30 AM patients underwent left ventricle LGE-CMR and STE measurement, acquiring 18 segmental values depicting edema extent and peak longitudinal strain, respectively. Baseline segmental correlation was compared to average patient segmental correlation and to segmental correlation after spatial resolution reduction achieved by averaging adjacent segments in four successive iterations, where the degree of spatial resolution reduction was evaluated based on the relative decrease in segmental standard deviation. Results: Baseline segmental correlation was weak, i.e., r = 0.24 (p < 0.05) but improved in fitted SLGE and SpLS baseline correlation (r0 = 0.44, p < 0.05) and in average patient correlation (r = 0.55, p < 0.05). Iterative spatial resolution reduction increased the correlation to r1 = 0.49 and r2 = 0.51 and then decreased it to r3 = 0.11 (p < 0.05) and r4 = 0.07 (p > 0.05), with corresponding decreases in segmental standard deviation relative to baseline from σ0 = 12.87 to σ/σ0 = 0.68, 0.51, 0.38, and 0.29 in SLGE values and σ0 = 4.77 to σ/σ0 = 0.57, 0.41, 0.31, and 0.23 in SpLS. Conclusions: Improved correlation in average patients is associated with natural heterogeneity, which indicates a need to develop more robust indicators of ventricular function. The improved correlation in moderate spatial resolution reduction indicates a potential solution for anatomic orientation mismatch between CMR-LGE and STE techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Awais et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: