Why the study?
Supervised deep learning for AF detection requires time-consuming labeling, suffers from data dependency, and lacks clinical interpretability for physicians.
Does an unsupervised LSTM-based autoencoder anomaly detection system analyzing PreQ, QRS, and PostS ECG segments accurately detect atrial fibrillation in 10-second Lead II ECG recordings?
Does an unsupervised LSTM-based autoencoder anomaly detection system analyzing PreQ, QRS, and PostS ECG segments accurately detect atrial fibrillation in 10-second Lead II ECG recordings?
An unsupervised LSTM-autoencoder model analyzing ECG segment anomalies (specifically the PreQ segment) accurately detects atrial fibrillation (AUROC 0.96-0.98) while providing interpretable segment-level evidence to overcome the black-box limitations of conventional deep learning.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change AF detection practice; leaves open whether segment anomaly scores can replace labeled black-box models.
Early detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) is crucial for its effective management and prevention. Various methods for detecting AF using deep learning (DL) based on supervised learning with a large labeled dataset have a remarkable performance. However, supervised learning has several problems, as it is time-consuming for labeling and has a data dependency problem. Moreover, most of the DL methods do not provide any clinical evidence to physicians regarding the analysis of electrocardiography (ECG) for classification or detection of AF. To address these limitations, in this study, we proposed a novel AF diagnosis system using unsupervised learning for anomaly detection with three segments, PreQ, QRS, and PostS, based on the normal ECG. Two independent datasets, PTB-XL and China, were used in three experiments. We used a long short-term memory (LSTM)-based autoencoder to train the segments of the normal ECG. Based on the threshold of anomaly scores using mean squared error (MSE), it distinguished between normal and AF segments. In Experiment A, the best score was that of PreQ, which detected AF with an AUROC score of 0.96. In Experiment B and C for cross validation of each dataset, the best scores were also of PreQ, with AUROC scores of 0.9 and 0.95, respectively. To verify the significance of the anomaly score in distinguishing between AF and normal segments, we utilized an XG-Boosted model after generating anomaly scores in the three segments. The XG-Boosted model achieved an AUROC score of 0.98 and an F1 score of 0.94. AF detection using DL has been controversial among many physicians. However, our study differentiates itself from previous studies in that we can demonstrate evidence that distinguishes AF from normal segments based on the anomaly score.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: