Why the study?
Does titanium-nitride-oxide-coated bioactive stent implantation reduce major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention compared to paclitaxel-eluting stents?
Does titanium-nitride-oxide-coated bioactive stent implantation reduce major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention compared to paclitaxel-eluting stents?
Titanium-nitride-oxide-coated bioactive stents demonstrated superior 5-year clinical outcomes, including lower rates of MACE, MI, and stent thrombosis, compared to paclitaxel-eluting stents in a real-world PCI registry.
AIMS: We sought to present the 5-year clinical outcome of the titanium-nitride-oxide-coated bioactive stents (BAS), as compared to paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES), in a real-world patient population. METHODS: From May 2003 to November 2004, we enrolled 405 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with either BAS or PES implantation. Patients were prospectively followed up for 5 years. The primary end-point was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 5-year follow-up including cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or target lesion revascularization. RESULTS: A total of 201 patients received BAS (218 lesions/221 stents) while 204 patients received PES (244 lesions/247 stents). Clinical follow-up for 5 years was completed in all patients. Cumulative MACE at the end of 5-year follow-up occurred in 34 (16.9%) patients in the BAS group, as compared to 53 (26%) in the PES group (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.8, P = 0.03). This difference was mainly driven by a lower incidence of MI in the BAS group as compared with the PES group (9.5% vs. 20.6%, OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.4-4.4, P = 0.002). Stent thrombosis occurred in 16 (7.8%) patients in the PES group, while no one suffered stent thrombosis in the BAS group. CONCLUSION: BAS implantation in a real-world patient population achieves an excellent clinical outcome over 5-year follow-up, with a significantly lower incidence of MI, MACE, and stent thrombosis as compared to PES.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karjalainen et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: