A spectrophotometric assay was devised to characterize the asparaginyl (Asn) endopeptidase activity from the endosperm of castor oil seeds. ( Ricinus communis L. var. Baker 296). The assay measures the release of p ‐nitroaniline from the hydrolysis of benzoyl‐l‐Asn‐ p ‐nitroanilide. Assay sensitivity was improved through diazotization of the reaction product with N (]‐napthy])‐ethylenediamine dihydrochloride: diazotized p ‐nitroaniline was determined spectrophotometrically at 548 nm (ɛ 548 = 1.64 × 10 −1 M −1 cm −2 ). By using this assay. Asn endopeptidase activity was detected in endosperm extracts of developing, mature and germinating castor seeds. Comparison of the Asn endopeptidase activities of developing and germinating castor endosperms revealed that they: 1) have identical pH‐activity profiles with optimal activity occuring at pH 5.4: 2) are heat‐labile proteins displaying comparable thermal stability profiles, and 3) are activated and inhibited by dithiothreitol and thiol modifying reagents, respectively. Thus, the Asn endopeptidases of developing and germinating castor seeds are very similar, if not identical, cysteine proteases. The most significant increase in the activity of endosperm Asn endopeptidase occurs during the full coryledon to maturation stage of seed development, this period coincides with the most active phase of reserve protein accumulation by ripening castor oil seeds. Asn endopeptidase activity of fully mature (dry) castor seeds was about 2‐fold lower than that of muturation stage ripening castor oil seed. Asn endopeptidase activity showed a slight reduction over the inicial 2‐day period following seed imbibition, and then rapidly decreased over the next several days of germination. The results are compatible with the proposal that Asn endopeptidase functions both to process storage preproteins following their import into protein bodies of developing seeds, as well as to participate in the mobilization of storage proteins during the early phase of seed germination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cornel et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: