Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study characterised the geometric and aerodynamic parameters of 35 insect-proof screens with different weft and warp threads, with porosities ranging from 0.237 to 0.556 m2 m−2. The geometric parameters were assessed by analysing digital images, and the aerodynamic parameters were determined using tests in a low-speed wind tunnel. Using the experimental measurements, four different models were developed and validated to estimate the aerodynamic parameters of an insect-proof screen from two or more of their geometric parameters: (i) to estimate the pressure drop coefficient Fφ based on the thread diameter Reynolds number (Red) and screen porosity φ [m2 m−2] Fφ = (0.4810002 + 11.5331/Red) × ((1 − φ2)/φ2) (R2 = 93.9% with a p-value = 0.000); (ii) estimating Fφ based on the screen thickness Reynolds number (Ret) and screen porosity φ [m2 m−2] Fφ = (0.475502 + 26.2114/Ret) × ((1 − φ2)/φ2) (R2 = 92.1% with a p-value = 0.000); (iii) estimating screen permeability Kp = Dh2φ3/(2.0679 (1 − φ)2) + 3.8362 × 10−10 (R2 = 56.3% with a p-value <0.05) as a function of thread diameter Dh [m] and porosity φ [m2 m−2]; (iv) estimating the inertial factor Y = 0.0571195 + 0.135966· Dh/Di (R2 = 58.1% with a p-value = 0.0000) as a function of thread diameter Dh [m] and the inner pore diameter Di [m]. These models gave improved accuracy compared with the previous models described in the literature. Models for aerodynamic parameters of the insect-proof screens Kp and Y based in their geometric characteristics are very important to simulate the effects of insect screens in ventilation studies using computational fluid dynamic (CFD) studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
López et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: