Introduction: This study characterizes foods offered by children’s menus at chain restaurants and determines whether differences exist in the nutritional quality between fast-food and traditional restaurants. Methodology: this is a cross-sectional study. After evaluating its inter-observer reliability, the Kids Menu Healthy Score (KIMEHS) was used to determine the nutritional quality of children’s menus. Setting: Chain restaurants located within major shopping centers in the Greater Metropolitan Area (GMA) of Costa Rica in 2023. Participants: 74 unique chain restaurants were included. Outcomes: Availability of children´s menus, KIMEHS individual categories (presence/absence) and overall KIMEHS score. Results: Of all restaurants, 41.9% offered a children’s menu. According to KIMEHS, 97% of these menus were considered unhealthy. There were no significant differences between fast food and traditional restaurants. The most frequent main dishes were chicken nuggets (83.9%), hamburgers (54.8%) and pasta (41.9%). Most restaurants (83.9%) included French fries as a side dish, while only 6.4% offered fruit in their menus. Conclusion: The children’s menus offered had poor nutritional quality, with limited variety and availability of healthy options. There is a need for policies and practices that promote better nutritional quality of food available to children when they eat outside the home in the restaurant setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pazos-Sibaja et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: