Why the study?
To understand major adverse vascular event rates in hemodialysis patients to inform the design and feasibility of phase 3 trials evaluating novel factor XIa inhibitors.
The observed incidence of major adverse vascular events in hemodialysis patients suggests that designing a phase 3 trial for novel antithrombotic agents would require a large sample size (≈7000 patients) and face challenges due to high competing risks.
BACKGROUND: People with kidney failure have a high risk of cardiovascular morbidity/death, including thromboembolic events. Factor XIa inhibitors are a new class of anticoagulants in development that may offer antithrombotic benefits with a lower risk of incremental bleeding events than traditional therapies. We investigated major adverse vascular events (MAVEs), a relevant composite outcome for testing novel antithrombotic agents, in a large cohort of patients on hemodialysis, to better understand the key requirements to adequately design a phase 3 trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 25 211 patients on hemodialysis for >90 days in phases 4 to 7 (2009-2021) of the DOPPS (Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study). Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) was defined as history/presence of coronary, peripheral, or cerebrovascular disease. We estimated MAVE rates and cumulative incidence, overall and by ASCVD. Over half (52%) of the cohort met the ASCVD criteria. The MAVE hospitalization/death composite rate (per 100 patient-years) was 6.0 in the overall cohort and 8.7 in the ASCVD subset. Three-year cumulative incidence of MAVE was 13% in the overall cohort and 18% in the ASCVD subset. The estimated sample size to be randomized in a hypothetical trial in the ASCVD population was ≈7000 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Even in the enriched ASCVD group, the observed MAVE incidence combined with a high competing risk, regulatory requirements (α=0.01), and limited recruitment pool makes feasibility of a potential randomized trial targeting MAVE reduction challenging. These results highlight key considerations and challenges for developers of novel therapies targeting systemic thromboembolic events in patients on hemodialysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karaboyas et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: