Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Chronic low-grade inflammation is the common mechanism of both atherosclerosis and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) has been emerged as a novel and simple inflammatory biomarker. However, the association between SII and glycemic metabolism and their synergetic effect on the prognosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) patients remains unclear. Methods: A total of 8602 patients hospitalized for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were included. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization. According to the optimal cut-off value of SII for MACEs, patients were grouped into higher levels of SII (SII-H) and lower levels of SII (SII-L) and further divided by the concomitance of T2DM into four groups: SII-H/T2DM, SII-H/Non-T2DM, SII-L/T2DM, SII-L/Non-T2DM. Results: During a median 2.4-year follow-up, 522 MACEs occurred. The optimal cut-off value of SII for MACEs was 502.5. A 1-unit increase of SII (transformed by natural logarithm) was associated with a 29% increase of MACE risks in the T2DM cohort [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03 to 1.61, P = 0.024], while had no effect in the non-T2DM cohort (HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.80 to 1.34, P = 0.800). Compared to those in SII-H/T2DM group, patients in SII-H/Non-T2DM, SII-L/T2DM, SII-L/Non-T2DM had significantly decreased risk of MACEs [adjusted HR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61 to 0.98, P = 0.036; adjusted HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.50 to 0.87, P = 0.003; adjusted HR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.74, P < 0.001; respectively]. Multivariable Cox regression analysis also indicated the highest risk in T2DM patients with higher levels of SII than others (P for trend < 0.001). Conclusion: In this large-scale real-world study, diabetic patients with elevated SII levels were associated with worse clinical outcomes after PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bian et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: