This letter presents the results of two different ensemble approaches to increase the accuracy of land cover classification using support vector machines. Finite ensemble approaches, based on boosting and bagging and infinite ensemble created by embedding the infinite hypothesis in the kernel of support vector machines, are discussed. Results suggest that the infinite ensemble approach provides a significant increase in the classification accuracy in comparison to the radial basis function kernel‐based support vector machines. While using finite ensemble approaches, bagging works well and provides a comparable performance to the infinite ensemble approach, whereas boosting decreases the performance of support vector machines. Comparison in terms of computational cost suggests that finite ensemble approaches require a large processing time in comparison to the infinite ensemble approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2008 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: