Why the study?
Do simulation technologies and intracardiac echocardiography improve procedural precision and outcomes in structural cardiac interventions compared to standard imaging?
Do simulation technologies and intracardiac echocardiography improve procedural precision and outcomes in structural cardiac interventions compared to standard imaging?
Simulation technologies and ICE offer personalized, accurate procedural planning and guidance for structural interventions, potentially improving technical outcomes and efficiency.
Hypothesis-generating for simulation and ICE in LAAC; prospective trials needed before changing TEE-guided practice.
In recent years, structural interventions have explored three-dimensional printing and computer simulation technologies to facilitate optimal device selections for more efficient procedures with fewer patient complications. Cardiovascular procedures, both structural interventions and electrophysiological procedures, have examined the utility of intracardiac echocardiography. In this review, we will discuss the growth of these technologies and highlight recent studies with a key focus on left atrial appendage closure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chandrasekhar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: