A molecular simulation study is reported for the adsorption of water and alcohols (methanol and ethanol) in two metal−organic frameworks (MOFs) topologically similar to rho -zeolite; one is a hydrophilic Na + -exchanged rho -zeolite-like MOF (Na- rho -ZMOF), and the other is a hydrophobic zeolitic−imidazolate framework-71 (ZIF-71). The adsorption isotherms in Na- rho -ZMOF are type I as a consequence of the high affinity of the nonframework Na + ions and ionic framework. The adsorption capacity decreases in the order of water > methanol > ethanol. Water is adsorbed more closely in the window region, whereas methanol and ethanol are populated in the α cage due to steric effect. In water/methanol and water/ethanol mixtures, water adsorption increases continuously with increasing pressure and replaces alcohols competitively at high pressures. In ZIF-71, the framework−adsorbate affinity is relatively weaker and type V adsorption is observed. Water has vanishingly small adsorption at low pressures and a sharp increase in adsorption at 22 kPa due to capillary condensation. Methanol and ethanol exhibit cluster-growth adsorption, followed by continuous pore filling. The adsorption in ZIF-71 increases in the order of water < methanol < ethanol at low pressures; however, the opposite order is observed at high pressures because of entropy effect. In water/alcohol mixtures, alcohols are selectively more adsorbed at low pressures but surpassed by water with increasing pressure. The framework charges have a substantial effect on adsorption in Na- rho -ZMOF, but not in ZIF-71. This study provides a molecular understanding for the adsorption of water and alcohols in two zeolitic MOFs with the identical topology and reveals the significantly different adsorption mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nalaparaju et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: