Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Active learning (AL) methods that select unlabeled samples only querying by informative measures (i.e., uncertainty and/or diversity criteria) have been extensively investigated. However, these methods usually do not exploit the manifold structure of the unlabeled data from the geometrical point of view, a choice that might lead to a sample bias and consequently undesirable performances. To control and possibly overcome such drawbacks, this paper explores AL methods based on joint informative and manifold structure representative sampling (JI-MSRS). In JI-MSRS, a portion of the unlabeled samples that are added at each iteration is selected according to the informative measures, whereas another portion is selected according to their capability to represent the data cluster structure. Four popular manifold learning methods, namely, principle component analysis (PCA), linear discriminant analysis, kernel PCA, and neighborhood preserving embedding, are used to model the data structure. Then, Delaunay triangulation nets are used to build a discrete approximation of the geometrical structure of the unlabeled data cloud in a low-dimensional space. To show the effectiveness of this novel sampling strategy, results on three real multi-/hyperspectral data sets are presented, adding a thorough comparison with other state-of-the-art AL techniques. In comparison to conventional AL heuristics, the proposed techniques are able to obtain competitive or even better classification accuracy values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samat et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: