Why the study?
Does N-acetylcysteine attenuate cardiac sympathetic hyperinnervation and arrhythmogenic response in post-infarcted rats?
Does N-acetylcysteine attenuate cardiac sympathetic hyperinnervation and arrhythmogenic response in post-infarcted rats?
In a rat model of myocardial infarction, N-acetylcysteine attenuated sympathetic hyperinnervation and reduced the arrhythmogenic response to programmed electrical stimulation.
Hypothesis-generating for NAC post-MI; should not yet influence clinical practice or human trials.
AIMS: The purpose of this study was to determine whether N-acetylcysteine (NAC) attenuates cardiac sympathetic hyperinnervation through replenishment of glutathione in infarcted rats. METHODS AND RESULTS: After ligation of the coronary artery, male Wistar rats were randomized to either vehicle, NAC, or vitamins C + E groups for 4 weeks. Post-infarction was associated with increased oxidant release, as measured by tissue isoprostane and myocardial glutathione. Measurement of myocardial norepinephrine levels revealed a significant elevation in vehicle-treated infarcted rats compared with sham-operated rats. Sympathetic hyperinnervation was blunted after administering NAC, as assessed by immunofluorescent analysis of tyrosine hydroxylase and western blotting and real-time quantitative RT-PCR of nerve growth factor. Arrhythmic scores during programmed stimulation in the vehicle-treated infarcted rats were significantly higher than those in animals treated with NAC. Although NAC and vitamins showed similar effects on ventricular remodelling, only NAC demonstrated beneficial effects on sympathetic hyperinnervation. Furthermore, the effects of NAC on nerve growth factor were abolished by administering l-buthionine sulfoximinem, an inhibitor of gamma-glutamylcysteine ligase. CONCLUSION: Chronic use of NAC, but not vitamins, after infarction is associated with down-regulation of nerve growth factor proteins, probably through a glutathione-dependent pathway, and thus plays a critical role in the beneficial effect on the arrhythmogenic response to programmed electrical stimulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: