In order to investigate the details of the process of pore condensation and hysteresis mechanisms in three-dimensional (3-D) pore networks, we performed a systematic study of the adsorption and pore condensation behavior of N 2 (77.4 K) and Ar (77.4 and 87.3 K) in a 3-D ordered pore system, i.e., cubic Ia 3̅ d mesoporous KIT-6 silica materials with mode pore diameters ranging from ca. 5 nm up to 11 nm. KIT-6 silica is a porous material composed of two intertwined mesoporous subnetworks similar as in MCM-48, but this material can be prepared with much larger mean pore diameters. Accurate pore size analysis was performed by X-ray diffraction modeling and by state-of the art application of nonlocal density functional theory (NLDFT) on N 2 (77.4 K) and Ar (87.3 K) sorption data. Furthermore, our data suggest that the width of the adsorption/desorption hysteresis loop observed for 3-D KIT-6 silica can be narrower as compared to that of pseudo-one-dimensional SBA-15 silica of the same pore size (i.e., in the pore diameter range from 6 to 8 nm). This specific behavior correlates well with the existence of the highly interconnected 3-D pore network of the KIT-6 material. Moreover, the results of our investigations are also consistent with previous observations that the SBA-15 pore system becomes more and more interconnected with increasing aging temperatures, i.e., SBA-15 changes from being a material with a pseudo-one-dimensional mesopore system to a material exhibiting a three-dimensional pore system resembling KIT-6 silica. These results provide new insights into the effects of pore interconnectivity on pore condensation and hysteresis behavior in both KIT-6 and SBA-15 silica materials and enable a more thorough understanding of the pore structure and textural properties of these materials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kleitz et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: