Male broiler chicks were fed ad libitum diets containing 18, 23, or 30% protein for 3 weeks. In addition, chicks were fed diets containing 12, 23, or 30% protein on a 3-day rotation. Finally, chicks were fed either the 23 or 30% protein on a schedule of 2 days on feed and 1 day off feed. These feeding schemes allowed chicks to consume low to excess protein coupled with either adequate or inadequate energy intake. Feed intakes were equal for the 18, 23, and rotational percent protein dietary groups and lower (P<.05) for the 30% ad libitum group. Chicks fed the 18% protein diet ad libitum were the least efficient (P<.05) at utilizing feed and the most efficient (P<.05) at utilizing protein for weight gain. Compared to the ad libitum situation, restricted feeding improved feed and protein efficiency of chicks fed 30% protein diets but not of chicks fed 23% protein diets. Body composition data on a dry matter basis supported a positive relationship between dietary protein and percent lean tissue. Conversely, expressing data on a whole bird basis indicated that lean body mass was favored by feeding the diet containing 23% protein. In vitro lipogenesis was greatest (P<.05) in chicks fed a 18% protein diet ad libitum and least (P<.05) in chicks fed a 30% protein diets ad libitum. The overall rate of in vitro lipogenesis for the rotational group (12 plus 23 plus 30/3) was less than that for the 18% ad libitum group and more than that for 23% ad líbitum group. Compared with ad libitum fed controls, feed withdrawal decreased (P<.05) and refeeding increased (P<.05) in vitro lipogenesis in chicks fed diets containing either 23 or 30% protein. The overall rate of lipogenesis (1 off plus 1 on plus 2 on/3) for each of these two levels of protein was greater than for the respective ad libitum feeding. Malic enzyme activity paralleled changes in the rates of in vitro lipogenesis while glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase and isocitrate dehydrogenase activities were more indicative of the protein status of the chick.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosebrough et al. (1985) studied this question.