Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aim: This study aimed to explore preceptors’ perceptions and experiences of clinical birth education. Design: A qualitative descriptive design was employed. Methods: The study involved 22 preceptors engaged in clinical birth education. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using conventional content analysis. Results: Analysis revealed four overarching themes: (1) causes of fear, (2) sources of motivation, (3) deficiencies in clinical midwifery education, and (4) characteristics of high-quality education. Conclusion: Optimizing clinical learning in birth wards requires effective management of students’ emotions and the enhancement of their motivation. Addressing deficiencies, improving the clinical learning environment, and selecting qualified preceptors – supported by targeted preceptorship training are critical to advancing the quality of birth education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
İşbir et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: