Why the study?
Risk stratification is essential for evaluating disease severity in PAH, prompting the application of the 4-strata COMPERA 2.0 risk model to the Phase 3 PATENT-1/2 studies of riociguat.
Does riociguat improve COMPERA 2.0 risk strata and long-term outcomes compared to placebo in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension?
Does riociguat improve COMPERA 2.0 risk strata and long-term outcomes compared to placebo in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension?
This post hoc analysis externally validates the COMPERA 2.0 risk assessment tool in a clinical trial population and demonstrates that riociguat improves risk strata in intermediate-risk PAH patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Risk-status gains with riociguat should not yet change practice; leaves open whether COMPERA 2.0 should guide escalation.
Risk stratification is an essential part of evaluating disease severity in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). This study applied the 4-strata COMPERA 2.0 risk model to the Phase 3 PATENT-1/2 studies of riociguat. This was a post hoc analysis of PATENT-1 and PATENT-2. Log-rank tests of Kaplan–Meier curves were performed to compare the risk strata at PATENT-1 baseline and Week 12 regarding time to clinical worsening and survival at 2 years in the PATENT-2 population. Data on COMPERA 2.0 status at baseline were available for 214 patients with riociguat and 100 with placebo; overall, 120 patients were identified as intermediate-low risk and 96 as intermediate-high risk. At PATENT-1 Week 12, improvements in COMPERA 2.0 risk strata and median 6-minute walk distance were seen with riociguat vs placebo in patients assessed as intermediate-low risk and intermediate-high risk at baseline by COMPERA 2.0. More patients improved their COMPERA 2.0 risk status with riociguat vs placebo in the intermediate-low (38 % vs 22 %) and intermediate-high risk groups (42 % vs 31 %). COMPERA 2.0 assessed at PATENT-1 baseline and Week 12 discriminated between risk strata for survival and clinical worsening in PATENT-2 at 2 years ( p ≤ .001 for all analyses). In conclusion, this analysis supports the risk-reduction benefits of riociguat in patients with PAH at intermediate-low risk and intermediate-high risk, and externally validated the utility of COMPERA 2.0 in the long-term risk assessment of patients from a clinical trial population. • Risk stratification is an essential part of disease management in patients with PAH • The COMPERA 2.0 risk assessment model was applied to PATENT-1 and PATENT-2 • Riociguat improved COMPERA 2.0 risk strata and 6MWD in PATENT-1 • Improvements were seen in patients at intermediate-low and intermediate-high risk • COMPERA 2.0 was associated with survival and clinical worsening in PATENT-2
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoeper et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: