Why the study?
Clazosentan has emerged as an essential therapy for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, but evidence regarding combination therapy with adjunctive agents remains unclear.
Does clazosentan plus ozagrel sodium reduce vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage compared to fasudil plus ozagrel sodium?
Does clazosentan plus ozagrel sodium reduce vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage compared to fasudil plus ozagrel sodium?
In patients with aSAH, clazosentan combined with ozagrel sodium improves short-term functional outcomes and reduces symptomatic vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia compared to a fasudil-based regimen, but increases respiratory complications.
Clazosentan, a selective endothelin A receptor antagonist, has recently emerged as an essential therapy for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) in Japan. However, evidence regarding combination therapy with adjunctive agents remains unclear. We retrospectively compared patients with aSAH treated with fasudil plus ozagrel sodium (fasudil group) and those treated with clazosentan plus ozagrel sodium (clazosentan group). The primary outcomes were angiographical vasospasm, symptomatic vasospasm (SVS), and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). A total of 95 patients were included (55 in the fasudil group, 40 in the clazosentan group). Although the incidence of angiographical vasospasm did not significantly differ between groups (69.1% vs. 50%, p = 0.088), the clazosentan group showed significantly lower rates of SVS (30.9% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.049) and DCI (40% vs. 20%, p = 0.046). Favorable functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale ≤ 2) at discharge were more frequent in the clazosentan group (38.2% vs 70%, p = 0.003). Respiratory complications occurred more frequently in the clazosentan group (12.7% vs. 35%, p = 0.013). Clazosentan combined with ozagrel sodium was associated with a lower rate of SVS and DCI and a higher rate of favorable short-term functional outcome compared with a conventional fasudil-based regimen after aSAH. This combination therapy may offer additional clinical benefit, although attention to respiratory complications is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shiozaki et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: