Panel study demonstrates higher valuation for credible net-zero strategies among Middle Eastern listed firms, indicating financial markets reward authentic corporate decarbonization.
Corporate net-zero pledges have proliferated across the Middle East, yet whether capital markets distinguish credible decarbonization strategies from symbolic ones remains unexamined in energy-exporting emerging markets, a gap this study addresses. This omission matters because the six Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) economies in our sample face acute stranded-asset exposure amid national diversification programmes such as Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 and the UAE’s Operation 300bn. We test whether net-zero credibility is associated with firm valuation among 167 listed firms across seven Middle Eastern countries (2020–2025, 1002 firm-year observations), constructing a five-dimension Credibility Index (pathway specificity, capex alignment, verification, policy compliance, and track record) and applying event-study, pooled panel regression, mediation, moderation, and firm/year fixed-effects analysis. The index is internally consistent (Cronbach’s α = 0.92) and its estimated valuation association is invariant to equal, alternative and leave-one-out weighting schemes. Credibility is positively associated with all four valuation multiples (p < 0.001, firm-clustered standard errors); a one-standard-deviation increase corresponds to a 0.133 increase in Tobin’s Q (95% CI [0.116, 0.149]). High-credibility announcements earn cumulative abnormal returns 5.95 percentage points above low-credibility announcements over (−5, +5) trading days (95% CI [4.79, 7.11]), a gap robust to nonparametric tests, placebo dates and strictly pre-announcement credibility scoring. The association survives firm and year fixed effects (within-firm β = 0.119 per SD, p < 0.001). No moderator—foreign ESG fund, domestic institutional or sovereign wealth fund ownership, regulatory stringency, carbon intensity or financial health—reaches significance after correction for multiple testing, so we find no evidence of investor-type or jurisdictional heterogeneity in this sample. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first Middle East-calibrated, capex-verified credibility index and the first evidence on the pricing of transition authenticity across GCC markets and Egypt, informing regulators, boards, and ESG investors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Algharari et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: