Pilot evaluation demonstrates high educational utility for combined cadaver and 3D phantom simulation in surgical trainees, suggesting a scalable pathway for complex hip arthroplasty training.
Introduction: The demand for structured training in orthopaedic surgery, particularly in total hip arthroplasty (THA), is increasing. Cadaver labs provide valuable experience for surgical access and anatomical exposure; however, the availability of specimens with predefined pathological features, such as dysplastic hip anatomy, is limited and difficult to standardize. This study presents a preliminary assessment of an integrated curriculum combining cadaver-based practice and patient-specific phantom simulation for task-oriented THA training. Methods: The curriculum included theoretical lessons, cadaver lab practice, and phantom-based training. The phantom models were developed from CT data of a patient with severe hip dysplasia and designed to reproduce selected anatomical and procedural challenges. Eight novice trainees and three expert tutors completed a multidomain 5-point Likert questionnaire assessing realism, face and content validity, perceived usefulness, and the complementary role of cadaver- and phantom-based sessions. Results: Participants reported high satisfaction and perceived the integrated pathway as useful. Cadaver training was rated higher for surgical access realism, whereas phantom simulation was considered valuable for rehearsing pathology-specific tasks involving altered femoral and acetabular anatomy. Conclusions: Integrating patient-specific phantoms into cadaver-based THA training appears feasible and was perceived as educationally valuable, adding a reproducible, pathology-specific simulation component and supporting future assessment strategies with objective performance metrics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carbone et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: