Cohort study reveals that prolonged oxygen recovery time after walking predicts mortality in interstitial lung disease, indicating its value in enhancing clinical risk prediction models.
Introduction Six-minute walk test (6MWT) parameters assess prognosis in interstitial lung disease (ILD). While exercise-induced desaturation and six-minute walk distance (6MWD) are established predictors, the prognostic value of oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ) recovery time is less clear and is not included in current 6MWT risk models like distance-oxygen gender age physiology (DO-GAP) and oxygen flow rate, distance, dyspnoea and saturation (ODDS), Methods 323 ILD patients undergoing 6MWT at Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust were included. SpO 2 recovery time was defined as the time taken for SpO 2 % to return within 2% of baseline following 6MWT. Associations with 1- and 2-year mortality or lung transplantation were assessed using ROC analysis, Kaplan–Meier curves, and Cox regression. Incremental prognostic value was evaluated by adding SpO 2 recovery time to DO-GAP and ODDS models using C-index, AIC, and likelihood ratio testing. Results SpO 2 recovery demonstrated good discrimination for 1- and 2-year outcomes (AUC 0.75 and 0.73). Kaplan–Meier and pairwise analyses showed a graded association between recovery time and outcomes, with significant differences between <90, 90–120, and >120 s, although separation was greatest for >120 s. In multivariable analysis, TLCO (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.92–0.96, p<0.001), FVC (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97–1.00, p=0.028), and SpO 2 recovery >120 s (HR 2.11, 95% CI 1.04–4.29, p=0.039) were independently associated with outcomes. Addition of SpO 2 recovery improved ODDS model performance (p<0.01) and DO-GAP in whole cohort. Conclusions Prolonged SpO 2 recovery time (>120 s) independently predicted outcomes and improved existing developed risk models in ILD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robertson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: