Retrospective cohort study reveals varied diagnostic timelines and high interleukin-6 inhibitor response rates across Castleman disease subtypes, highlighting the value of modern classification.
BACKGROUND CD (Castleman Disease) is a rare and heterogeneous condition that poses a diagnostic and management challenge. Classification of CD has changed dramatically in recent years. This study aims to describe our experience with diagnosis and treatment of CD at a center in Canada.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective study of our cohort of CD patients evaluated and treated at the University of British Columbia from 2016–2025.RESULTS A total of 23 patients with biopsy-confirmed CD were included. 7/23 had unicentric CD (UCD), 1/23 had OligoCD, and 15/23 had multicentric CD (MCD). All MCD cases were idiopathic (iMCD), and of these, 3/15 had iMCD-TAFRO, 4/15 had iMCD-IPL, and 8/15 had iMCD-not otherwise specified (iMCD-NOS). Median time to diagnosis was shortest for iMCD-TAFRO (1 month) and longest in iMCD-IPL (82 months). 100% of iMCD-TAFRO, 100% of iMCD-IPL, and 86% of iMCD-NOS cases treated with Siltuximab or Tocilizumab had at least a partial response.CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the heterogeneous presentation, natural history, and response to treatment of CD in a North American center, and highlights the importance of awareness of the different subtypes of CD. Key limitations are its retrospective design and small sample size.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MacLeod et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: