Cadaveric morphometric study demonstrates significant dimensional and positional asymmetry at the scapholunate interface, indicating crucial implications for carpal reconstruction surgery.
Background: Although the scapholunate ligamentous complex has gained significant importance in recent literature, the intrinsic articular interface itself remains insufficiently characterized. This study provides a detailed morphometric analysis of the scaphoid and lunate intrinsic facets to address this anatomical gap. Methods: Twenty-six cadaveric wrists were evaluated. The scapholunate interval height was measured with a 0.05 mm caliper. After cutting the scapholunate interosseous ligament, the scaphoid and lunate facets were exposed for linear height measurements. Standardized photographs were taken alongside a millimeter ruler. Total facet area (TFA) was quantified using ImageJ/Fiji software by converting pixels to square millimeters through a calibration scale and multipoint marking for area measurement. Statistical analysis included the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality, followed by Wilcoxon signed-rank or Student t tests ( P < .05). Results: Significant dimensional asymmetry was identified, with the lunate TFA being larger than the scaphoid TFA in 96.2% of the specimens ( P < .001). The lunate-to-scaphoid TFA ratio was 1.42. Quantitative positional asymmetry was confirmed, as the scapholunate interval height significantly exceeded the individual linear heights of both the scaphoid and lunate facets ( P < .001). Qualitative analysis of the joint geometry revealed further asymmetries in shape and inclination: the scaphoid facet was smaller and beveled, while the lunate facet was larger and orthogonal. Conclusions: A consistent mismatch at the scapholunate interface was found. These data offer new anatomical insights that may enhance diagnosis and surgical planning for carpal reconstruction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Souza et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: