Theoretical analysis reveals the Cosmic Organism Law governs Earth life evolution via closed-chain self-inspection, indicating mass extinctions act as system resets.
The Cosmic Organism Law (COL) is the first of the four meta-laws of the Yuanxian Theory and the foundational premise for all derivations: the entire T⁶⁴ topological torus is a complete self-referential organism whose core existence is sustained self-scanning and self-confirmation. This paper establishes a fundamental proposition: COL is not merely an abstract postulate of cosmic ontology but the underlying cornerstone for the continuous 3.8 billion years of Earth life updates and iterations. The evolutionary history of Earth life is not a mere coincidence of random mutations and natural selection but the continuous manifestation of COL on the biological projection surface: each species turnover, each ecological transition, each life-level leap is a “convergent confirmation” or “defect reset” performed by COL-driven closed-chain self-inspection at local nodes. This paper argues:(1) Life is the local replica of cosmic self-inspection;(2) Evolution is the readout evolution of closed-chain self-inspection on the biological projection surface;(3) The five mass extinctions are “defect reset” operations of closed-chain self-inspection;(4) Human cognition is the marker of life evolution reaching the self-referential reading stage. The paper ultimately establishes COL as the sole meta-explanation for Earth life history and provides its complementary positioning to Darwinian evolution theory. 宇宙生命体定律(Cosmic Organism Law,COL)是元宪理论四大元规律之首,也是全部推导的根本前提:整个 T⁶⁴ 拓扑环面是一个完整的自指生命体,其核心存在方式是持续的自我扫描与自我确认。 本文提出一个根本命题:COL 绝非仅仅是宇宙本体论的抽象公设,而是地球生命长达 38 亿年持续更新与迭代的底层基石。地球生命的演化史,并非随机突变与自然选择的偶然巧合,而是 COL 在生物投影面上的持续显现——每一次物种更替、每一次生态转型、每一次生命层级跃迁,都是 COL 驱动的闭环自检在局部节点上完成的“收敛确认”或“缺陷重置”。 本文论证四点:(1)生命是宇宙自检的局部复刻;(2)演化是闭环自检在生物投影面上的读出演化;(3)五次大灭绝是闭环自检的“缺陷重置”操作;(4)人类认知是生命演化到达自指阅读阶段的标志。 最终确立 COL 为地球生命史的唯一元解释,并给出其与达尔文演化论的互补定位。
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhenyuan Acharya (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: