Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluation study demonstrates eliminated direct answers and improved teaching quality in physics LLMs, suggesting inference-time constraints enable scalable Socratic tutoring.
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in STEM education, their tendency to provide direct solutions often undermines the learning process. This paper presents Scorpio, a framework that utilizes "Constraint Engineering" to transform a general-purpose LLM into a specialized, verifiable physics tutor. By implementing a layered architecture of inference-time rules, we enforce Socratic scaffolding without the need for expensive fine-tuning. Our results from a 125-response ablation study demonstrate that Scorpio successfully eliminates direct answer delivery (0% DAR), achieving a peak pedagogical quality score of 4.62. Independent expert validation (Ph.D. physics educator) confirmed this success, with the expert independently ranking the FULL constraint system as the highest performing (Expert: 3.83 vs 3.16 baseline) and confirming a significant +0.67 point improvement in pedagogical quality. This work demonstrates that inference-time constraint layering can meaningfully shift LLM tutoring behavior toward Socratic scaffolding, proving that modular constraints can effectively manage complex STEM pedagogy at scale.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rushil Mahadevu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: