We study the impact of the cosmological parameters uncertainties on the measurements of primordial non-Gaussianity through the large-scale non-Gaussian halo bias effect. While this is not expected to be an issue for the standard ΛCDM model, it may not be the case for more general models that modify the large-scale shape of the power spectrum. We consider the so-called local non-Gaussianity model, parametrized by the f NL non-Gaussianity parameter which is zero for a Gaussian case, and make forecasts on f NL from planned surveys, alone and combined with a Planck CMB prior. In particular, we consider EUCLID- and LSST-like surveys and forecast the correlations among f NL and the running of the spectral index α s , the dark energy equation of state w , the effective sound speed of dark energy perturbations c 2 s , the total mass of massive neutrinos M ν = ∑ m ν , and the number of extra relativistic degrees of freedom N ν rel . Neglecting CMB information on f NL and scales k > 0.03 h /Mpc, we find that, if N ν rel is assumed to be known, the uncertainty on cosmological parameters increases the error on f NL by 10 to 30% depending on the survey. Thus the f NL constraint is remarkable robust to cosmological model uncertainties. On the other hand, if N ν rel is simultaneously constrained from the data, the f NL error increases by ∼ 80%. Finally, future surveys which provide a large sample of galaxies or galaxy clusters over a volume comparable to the Hubble volume can measure primordial non-Gaussianity of the local form with a marginalized 1-σ error of the order Δ f NL ∼ 2−5, after combination with CMB priors for the remaining cosmological parameters. These results are competitive with CMB bispectrum constraints achievable with an ideal CMB experiment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carbone et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: