Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A portable C arm was modified for cone-beam computed tomography (CT). This three-dimensional (3D) CT imaging system facilitated the acquisition of fluoroscopic images during a 190 degrees rotation and computed a 3D data cube (matrix, 256 x 256 x 256; scanning time, 100 seconds) with multiplanar image reformation. The high-contrast resolution, 0.9 line pairs per millimeter, was comparable; the low-contrast resolution, minimal; and the radiation dose, 60%-80% lower, as compared with these parameters at spiral CT. The normal anatomy of small joints could be depicted, and the osteosynthesis screws in the talus were correctly identified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Linsenmaier et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: