Why the study?
Does physical activity at work and leisure time reduce the risk of acute myocardial infarction in a Chinese population?
Does physical activity at work and leisure time reduce the risk of acute myocardial infarction in a Chinese population?
Leisure-time strenuous physical activity is protective against acute myocardial infarction, whereas heavy work-related physical activity may increase the risk in the Chinese population.
May guide tailored activity advice with caution; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation in Chinese adults.
Physical activity (PA) during leisure time has been inversely associated with cardiovascular disease risk in the Western populations. We evaluated PA at work and leisure time in relation to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in Chinese population. We conducted a hospital-based case-control study. The cases had first AMI (n = 2909). The controls (n = 2947) were matched to the cases in age and sex. The odds ratios (ORs) of leisure-time PA for strenuous exercise compared to mainly sedentary was 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61-0.90) and for moderate exercise it was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.85-1.08). Multivariate adjustment did not substantially alter the association. The ORs of work-related PA for heavy PA compared to mainly sedentary was 1.44 (95% CI: 1.06-1.94), for climbing and lifting was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.77-.30), and for walking was 0.90 (95%CI: 0.75-1.07). Leisure-time PA was protective for AMI risk compared to sedentary lifestyles in a population in China.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: