Why the study?
Does Xuezhikang improve endothelial function and reduce inflammation in patients with coronary heart disease?
Does Xuezhikang improve endothelial function and reduce inflammation in patients with coronary heart disease?
Xuezhikang improves endothelial function and reduces inflammation and postprandial hypertriglyceridemia in patients with coronary heart disease.
Supports adjunctive xuezhikang use in CHD; extends lipid-lowering RCTs to endothelial and inflammatory endpoints.
BACKGROUND: Endothelial dysfunction is associated with inflammation and postprandial hypertriglyceridemia. Xuezhikang, an extract of Cholestin, a dietary supplement, has lipid-modulating and antiinflammatory effects. We explored the effects of xuezhikang on endothelial function and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively randomized 50 CHD patients to xuezhikang 1200 mg/d or placebo for 6 weeks. Fasting hs-CRP concentrations, flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) at 0 and 4 hours, and lipid parameters at 0, 2, 4, and 6 hours were monitored after a high-fat meal (800 calories; 50 g fat) in all patients. All patients underwent a high-fat meal test at the beginning of the study and after 6 weeks of treatment. Postprandial FMD was significantly worse at 4 hours after a high-fat meal (P<0.05), and this was associated with the area under the triglyceride curve (TG-AUC) (r=0.345, P<0.01). After 6 weeks of xuezhikang, fasting hs-CRP levels and TG-AUC (P<0.001 for each) decreased. Furthermore, preprandial and postprandial FMD significantly improved (P<0.001). There were no significant changes in serum lipids and FMD in the placebo arm. In multivariable regression analysis, changes in TG-AUC and fasting hs-CRP levels were predictive of improvement in preprandial FMD (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Xuezhikang effectively improved preprandial and postprandial endothelial function through its potent antiinflammatory and lipid-lowering effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: