A polyoxometalate of the Keggin structure substituted with Ru(III), (6)Q(5)[Ru(III)(H(2)O)SiW(11)O(39)] in which (6)Q=(C(6)H(13))(4)N(+), catalyzed the photoreduction of CO(2) to CO with tertiary amines, preferentially Et(3)N, as reducing agents. A study of the coordination of CO(2) to (6)Q(5)[Ru(III)(H(2)O)SiW(11)O(39)] showed that 1) upon addition of CO(2) the UV/Vis spectrum changed, 2) a rhombic signal was obtained in the EPR spectrum (g(x)=2.146, g(y)=2.100, and g(z)=1.935), and 3) the (13)C NMR spectrum had a broadened peak of bound CO(2) at 105.78 ppm (Delta(1/2)=122 Hz). It was concluded that CO(2) coordinates to the Ru(III) active site in both the presence and absence of Et(3)N to yield (6)Q(5)[Ru(III)(CO(2))SiW(11)O(39)]. Electrochemical measurements showed the reduction of Ru(III) to Ru(II) in (6)Q(5)[Ru(III)(CO(2))SiW(11)O(39)] at -0.31 V versus SCE, but no such reduction was observed for (6)Q(5)[Ru(III)(H(2)O)SiW(11)O(39)]. DFT-calculated geometries optimized at the M06/PC1//PBE/AUG-PC1//PBE/PC1-DF level of theory showed that CO(2) is preferably coordinated in a side-on manner to Ru(III) in the polyoxometalate through formation of a Ru-O bond, further stabilized by the interaction of the electrophilic carbon atom of CO(2) to an oxygen atom of the polyoxometalate. The end-on CO(2) bonding to Ru(III) is energetically less favorable but CO(2) is considerably bent, thus favoring nucleophilic attack at the carbon atom and thereby stabilizing the carbon sp(2) hybridization state. Formation of a O(2)C-NMe(3) zwitterion, in turn, causes bending of CO(2) and enhances the carbon sp(2) hybridization. The synergetic effect of these two interactions stabilizes both Ru-O and C-N interactions and probably determines the promotional effect of an amine on the activation of CO(2) by [Ru(III)(H(2)O)SiW(11)O(39)](5-). Electronic structure analysis showed that the polyoxometalate takes part in the activation of both CO(2) and Et(3)N. A mechanistic pathway for photoreduction of CO(2) is suggested based on the experimental and computed results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khenkin et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: